Correlation Between John Hancock and Cohen Steers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both John Hancock and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining John Hancock and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between John Hancock Funds and Cohen Steers Mlp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on John Hancock and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in John Hancock with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of John Hancock and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for John Hancock and Cohen Steers

0.38
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between John and Cohen is 0.38. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding John Hancock Funds and Cohen Steers Mlp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Mlp and John Hancock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on John Hancock Funds are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Mlp has no effect on the direction of John Hancock i.e., John Hancock and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between John Hancock and Cohen Steers

Assuming the 90 days horizon John Hancock is expected to generate 2.31 times less return on investment than Cohen Steers. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, John Hancock Funds is 3.25 times less risky than Cohen Steers. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Mlp is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  835.00  in Cohen Steers Mlp on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  35.00  from holding Cohen Steers Mlp or generate 4.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

John Hancock Funds  vs.  Cohen Steers Mlp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
John Hancock Funds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in John Hancock Funds are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking signals, John Hancock is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Cohen Steers Mlp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Mlp are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

John Hancock and Cohen Steers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with John Hancock and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite John Hancock and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if John Hancock position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.
The idea behind John Hancock Funds and Cohen Steers Mlp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments