Correlation Between Hormel Foods and China Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hormel Foods and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hormel Foods and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hormel Foods and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hormel Foods and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hormel Foods with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hormel Foods and China Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Hormel Foods and China Communications

0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hormel and China is 0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hormel Foods and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and Hormel Foods is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hormel Foods are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of Hormel Foods i.e., Hormel Foods and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hormel Foods and China Communications

Assuming the 90 days horizon Hormel Foods is expected to generate 1.39 times less return on investment than China Communications. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Hormel Foods is 1.68 times less risky than China Communications. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  43.00  in China Communications Services on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8.00  from holding China Communications Services or generate 18.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hormel Foods  vs.  China Communications Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hormel Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hormel Foods are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Hormel Foods reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
China Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Communications Services are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, China Communications reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Hormel Foods and China Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hormel Foods and China Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hormel Foods and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hormel Foods position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.
The idea behind Hormel Foods and China Communications Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities