Correlation Between Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs Clean, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hartford Municipal with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs

0.15

Correlation Coefficient

Hartford Municipal  Goldman Sachs

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hartford and Goldman is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs Clean in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Clean and Hartford Municipal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Hartford Municipal are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Clean has no effect on the direction of Hartford Municipal i.e., Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon The Hartford Municipal is expected to generate 0.25 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, The Hartford Municipal is 3.96 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about -0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Clean is currently generating about -0.42 per unit of risk. If you would invest  844.00  in The Hartford Municipal on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (12.00) from holding The Hartford Municipal or give up 1.42% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

The Hartford Municipal  vs.  Goldman Sachs Clean

The Hartford Municipal

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days The Hartford Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Hartford Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs Clean

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Clean has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's forward-looking indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Pair Trading with Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hartford Municipal position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind The Hartford Municipal and Goldman Sachs Clean pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.