Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Inflation and New Hampshire Higher, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of New Hampshire. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire

0.53

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  New Hampshire

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and New is 0.53. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Inflation and New Hampshire Higher in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on New Hampshire Higher and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Inflation are associated (or correlated) with New Hampshire. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of New Hampshire Higher has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Inflation is expected to generate 0.4 times more return on investment than New Hampshire. However, Goldman Sachs Inflation is 2.52 times less risky than New Hampshire. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. New Hampshire Higher is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  938.00  in Goldman Sachs Inflation on December 20, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  31.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Inflation or generate 3.3% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Inflation  vs.  New Hampshire Higher

Goldman Sachs Inflation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Inflation are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

New Hampshire Higher

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in New Hampshire Higher are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong technical indicators, New Hampshire is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and New Hampshire positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, New Hampshire can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in New Hampshire will offset losses from the drop in New Hampshire's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Inflation and New Hampshire Higher pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.