Correlation Between GM and Zapata Computing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Zapata Computing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Zapata Computing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Zapata Computing Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Zapata Computing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Zapata Computing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Zapata Computing.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Zapata Computing

-0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Zapata is -0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Zapata Computing Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zapata Computing Holdings and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Zapata Computing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zapata Computing Holdings has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Zapata Computing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Zapata Computing

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 54.18 times less return on investment than Zapata Computing. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 41.25 times less risky than Zapata Computing. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zapata Computing Holdings is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2.99  in Zapata Computing Holdings on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2.43) from holding Zapata Computing Holdings or give up 81.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy55.56%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Zapata Computing Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Zapata Computing Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Over the last 90 days Zapata Computing Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly uncertain basic indicators, Zapata Computing showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Zapata Computing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Zapata Computing

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Zapata Computing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Zapata Computing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zapata Computing will offset losses from the drop in Zapata Computing's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Zapata Computing Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas