Correlation Between Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aggressive Allocation Fund and Low Duration Bond Investor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aggressive Allocation with a short position of Low-duration Bond. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond.
Diversification Opportunities for Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond
0.08 | Correlation Coefficient |
Significant diversification
The 3 months correlation between Aggressive and Low-duration is 0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aggressive Allocation Fund and Low Duration Bond Investor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Low Duration Bond and Aggressive Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aggressive Allocation Fund are associated (or correlated) with Low-duration Bond. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Low Duration Bond has no effect on the direction of Aggressive Allocation i.e., Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond
Assuming the 90 days horizon Aggressive Allocation Fund is expected to under-perform the Low-duration Bond. In addition to that, Aggressive Allocation is 9.83 times more volatile than Low Duration Bond Investor. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Low Duration Bond Investor is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 1,277 in Low Duration Bond Investor on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 14.00 from holding Low Duration Bond Investor or generate 1.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Aggressive Allocation Fund vs. Low Duration Bond Investor
Performance |
Timeline |
Aggressive Allocation |
Low Duration Bond |
Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond
The main advantage of trading using opposite Aggressive Allocation and Low-duration Bond positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aggressive Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Low-duration Bond can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Low-duration Bond will offset losses from the drop in Low-duration Bond's long position.The idea behind Aggressive Allocation Fund and Low Duration Bond Investor pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Low-duration Bond vs. Baillie Gifford Health | Low-duration Bond vs. Putnam Global Health | Low-duration Bond vs. Live Oak Health | Low-duration Bond vs. Blackrock Health Sciences |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Other Complementary Tools
Odds Of Bankruptcy Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |