Correlation Between Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Growth Allocation Index and Fidelity Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Growth Allocation with a short position of Fidelity Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging

0.78

Correlation Coefficient

Growth Allocation  Fidelity Emerging

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Growth and Fidelity is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Growth Allocation Index and Fidelity Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Emerging Markets and Growth Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Growth Allocation Index are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Growth Allocation i.e., Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Growth Allocation Index is expected to under-perform the Fidelity Emerging. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Growth Allocation Index is 1.86 times less risky than Fidelity Emerging. The mutual fund trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Fidelity Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,820  in Fidelity Emerging Markets on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (31.00) from holding Fidelity Emerging Markets or give up 0.81% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Growth Allocation Index  vs.  Fidelity Emerging Markets

Growth Allocation Index

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Growth Allocation Index has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Growth Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Fidelity Emerging Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Fidelity Emerging Markets has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking signals, Fidelity Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Growth Allocation and Fidelity Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Growth Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Emerging's long position.

The idea behind Growth Allocation Index and Fidelity Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.