Correlation Between Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Schwab Fundamental Small and Hartford Multifactor Developed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Schwab Fundamental with a short position of Hartford Multifactor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor.

Diversification Opportunities for Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor

-0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Schwab and Hartford is -0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Schwab Fundamental Small and Hartford Multifactor Developed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hartford Multifactor and Schwab Fundamental is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Schwab Fundamental Small are associated (or correlated) with Hartford Multifactor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hartford Multifactor has no effect on the direction of Schwab Fundamental i.e., Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Schwab Fundamental Small is expected to generate 1.68 times more return on investment than Hartford Multifactor. However, Schwab Fundamental is 1.68 times more volatile than Hartford Multifactor Developed. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Hartford Multifactor Developed is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,849  in Schwab Fundamental Small on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  373.00  from holding Schwab Fundamental Small or generate 13.09% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Schwab Fundamental Small  vs.  Hartford Multifactor Developed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Schwab Fundamental Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Schwab Fundamental Small are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak fundamental indicators, Schwab Fundamental may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Hartford Multifactor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hartford Multifactor Developed has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Hartford Multifactor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Schwab Fundamental and Hartford Multifactor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Schwab Fundamental position performs unexpectedly, Hartford Multifactor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hartford Multifactor will offset losses from the drop in Hartford Multifactor's long position.
The idea behind Schwab Fundamental Small and Hartford Multifactor Developed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope