Correlation Between Fidelity New and Spring Valley

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Fidelity New and Spring Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Fidelity New and Spring Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Fidelity New Markets and Spring Valley Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Fidelity New and Spring Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Fidelity New with a short position of Spring Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Fidelity New and Spring Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for Fidelity New and Spring Valley

-0.28

Correlation Coefficient

Fidelity New  Spring Valley

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Fidelity and Spring is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Fidelity New Markets and Spring Valley Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Valley Acquisition and Fidelity New is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Fidelity New Markets are associated (or correlated) with Spring Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Valley Acquisition has no effect on the direction of Fidelity New i.e., Fidelity New and Spring Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Fidelity New and Spring Valley

Assuming the 90 days horizon Fidelity New Markets is expected to generate 0.5 times more return on investment than Spring Valley. However, Fidelity New Markets is 1.99 times less risky than Spring Valley. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Valley Acquisition is currently generating about -0.38 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,287  in Fidelity New Markets on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  13.00  from holding Fidelity New Markets or generate 1.01% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Fidelity New Markets  vs.  Spring Valley Acquisition

Fidelity New Markets

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity New Markets are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Fidelity New is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Spring Valley Acquisition

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Spring Valley Acquisition has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong forward indicators, Spring Valley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Pair Trading with Fidelity New and Spring Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Fidelity New and Spring Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Fidelity New position performs unexpectedly, Spring Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Valley will offset losses from the drop in Spring Valley's long position.

The idea behind Fidelity New Markets and Spring Valley Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.