Correlation Between Federal Bank and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Federal Bank and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Federal Bank and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Federal Bank and Procter Gamble Health, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Federal Bank and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Federal Bank with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Federal Bank and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Federal Bank and Procter Gamble

0.47

Correlation Coefficient

Federal Bank  Procter Gamble

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Federal and Procter is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Federal Bank and Procter Gamble Health in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble Health and Federal Bank is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Federal Bank are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble Health has no effect on the direction of Federal Bank i.e., Federal Bank and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Federal Bank and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Federal Bank is expected to generate 1.43 times less return on investment than Procter Gamble. In addition to that, Federal Bank is 1.04 times more volatile than Procter Gamble Health. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble Health is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  516,548  in Procter Gamble Health on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  30,137  from holding Procter Gamble Health or generate 5.83% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

The Federal Bank  vs.  Procter Gamble Health

Federal Bank

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Federal Bank are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent fundamental drivers, Federal Bank is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Procter Gamble Health

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble Health are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively conflicting basic indicators, Procter Gamble may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Federal Bank and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Federal Bank and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Federal Bank position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind The Federal Bank and Procter Gamble Health pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.