Correlation Between Data Communications and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Data Communications and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Data Communications and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Data Communications Management and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Data Communications and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Data Communications with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Data Communications and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Data Communications and Maple Leaf

-0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Data and Maple is -0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Data Communications Management and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Data Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Data Communications Management are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Data Communications i.e., Data Communications and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Data Communications and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Data Communications Management is expected to under-perform the Maple Leaf. In addition to that, Data Communications is 2.84 times more volatile than Maple Leaf Foods. It trades about -0.1 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,168  in Maple Leaf Foods on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  92.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 4.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Data Communications Management  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Data Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Data Communications Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Data Communications and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Data Communications and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Data Communications and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Data Communications position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Data Communications Management and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume