Correlation Between Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Calvert Mid Cap and Columbia Seligman Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Calvert Mid with a short position of Columbia Seligman. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman.

Diversification Opportunities for Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman

0.87

Correlation Coefficient

Calvert Mid  Columbia Seligman

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Calvert and Columbia is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Calvert Mid Cap and Columbia Seligman Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Seligman Global and Calvert Mid is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Calvert Mid Cap are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Seligman. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Seligman Global has no effect on the direction of Calvert Mid i.e., Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman

Assuming the 90 days horizon Calvert Mid Cap is expected to generate 0.38 times more return on investment than Columbia Seligman. However, Calvert Mid Cap is 2.64 times less risky than Columbia Seligman. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Seligman Global is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,115  in Calvert Mid Cap on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  323.00  from holding Calvert Mid Cap or generate 7.85% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Strong
Accuracy	98.44%
Values	Daily Returns

Calvert Mid Cap  vs.  Columbia Seligman Global

Calvert Mid Cap

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Mid Cap are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Calvert Mid may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Columbia Seligman Global

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Weak

Over the last 90 days Columbia Seligman Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Seligman is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman

The main advantage of trading using opposite Calvert Mid and Columbia Seligman positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Calvert Mid position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Seligman can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Seligman will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Seligman's long position.

The idea behind Calvert Mid Cap and Columbia Seligman Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.