Correlation Between Citigroup and 404280CX5
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and HSBC 2251 22 NOV 27, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and 404280CX5 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of 404280CX5. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and 404280CX5.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and 404280CX5
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and 404280CX5 is 0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and HSBC 2251 22 NOV 27 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on HSBC 2251 22 and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with 404280CX5. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of HSBC 2251 22 has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and 404280CX5 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and 404280CX5
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 2.31 times more return on investment than 404280CX5. However, Citigroup is 2.31 times more volatile than HSBC 2251 22 NOV 27. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. HSBC 2251 22 NOV 27 is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7,038 in Citigroup on November 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 869.00 from holding Citigroup or generate 12.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 72.88% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. HSBC 2251 22 NOV 27
Performance |
Timeline |
Citigroup |
HSBC 2251 22 |
Citigroup and 404280CX5 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and 404280CX5
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and 404280CX5 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, 404280CX5 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 404280CX5 will offset losses from the drop in 404280CX5's long position.Citigroup vs. JPMorgan Chase Co | Citigroup vs. Wells Fargo | Citigroup vs. Toronto Dominion Bank | Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings |
404280CX5 vs. Suntory Beverage Food | 404280CX5 vs. Compania Cervecerias Unidas | 404280CX5 vs. Willamette Valley Vineyards | 404280CX5 vs. Boston Beer |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.
Other Complementary Tools
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Equity Forecasting Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets |