Correlation Between Citigroup and Strategic Advisers

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Strategic Advisers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Strategic Advisers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Strategic Advisers Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Strategic Advisers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Strategic Advisers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Strategic Advisers.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Strategic Advisers

-0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Strategic is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Strategic Advisers Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Advisers and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Advisers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Advisers has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Strategic Advisers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Strategic Advisers

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 1.59 times more return on investment than Strategic Advisers. However, Citigroup is 1.59 times more volatile than Strategic Advisers Emerging. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Advisers Emerging is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,815  in Citigroup on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  286.00  from holding Citigroup or generate 4.2% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Strategic Advisers Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Strategic Advisers 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Advisers Emerging are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Strategic Advisers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Citigroup and Strategic Advisers Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Strategic Advisers

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Strategic Advisers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Advisers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Advisers will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Advisers' long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Strategic Advisers Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals