Correlation Between Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Atrium Ljungberg AB and Arjo AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Atrium Ljungberg with a short position of Arjo AB. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB.
Diversification Opportunities for Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB
0.93 | Correlation Coefficient |
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Atrium and Arjo is 0.93. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Atrium Ljungberg AB and Arjo AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Arjo AB and Atrium Ljungberg is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Atrium Ljungberg AB are associated (or correlated) with Arjo AB. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Arjo AB has no effect on the direction of Atrium Ljungberg i.e., Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Atrium Ljungberg AB is expected to generate 0.58 times more return on investment than Arjo AB. However, Atrium Ljungberg AB is 1.73 times less risky than Arjo AB. It trades about -0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Arjo AB is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 23,033 in Atrium Ljungberg AB on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3,513) from holding Atrium Ljungberg AB or give up 15.25% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Atrium Ljungberg AB vs. Arjo AB
Performance |
Timeline |
Atrium Ljungberg |
Arjo AB |
Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB
The main advantage of trading using opposite Atrium Ljungberg and Arjo AB positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Atrium Ljungberg position performs unexpectedly, Arjo AB can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Arjo AB will offset losses from the drop in Arjo AB's long position.Atrium Ljungberg vs. Hufvudstaden AB | Atrium Ljungberg vs. Fabege AB | Atrium Ljungberg vs. Wihlborgs Fastigheter AB | Atrium Ljungberg vs. Fastighets AB Balder |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.
Other Complementary Tools
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |