Correlation Between Apple and Procter Gamble

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Apple and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Apple and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Apple Inc DRC and Procter Gamble DRC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Apple and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Apple with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Apple and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Apple and Procter Gamble

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Apple and Procter is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Apple Inc DRC and Procter Gamble DRC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble DRC and Apple is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Apple Inc DRC are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble DRC has no effect on the direction of Apple i.e., Apple and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Apple and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Apple Inc DRC is expected to generate 0.96 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Apple Inc DRC is 1.04 times less risky than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble DRC is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,860,800  in Apple Inc DRC on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (530,800) from holding Apple Inc DRC or give up 28.53% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Apple Inc DRC  vs.  Procter Gamble DRC

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Apple Inc DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Apple Inc DRC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Apple is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble DRC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Apple and Procter Gamble Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Apple and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Apple and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Apple position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.
The idea behind Apple Inc DRC and Procter Gamble DRC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital