Correlation Between Universal Insurance and Natural Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Universal Insurance and Natural Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Universal Insurance and Natural Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Universal Insurance Holdings and Natural Health Trends, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Universal Insurance and Natural Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Universal Insurance with a short position of Natural Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Universal Insurance and Natural Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Universal Insurance and Natural Health

-0.04
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Universal and Natural is -0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Universal Insurance Holdings and Natural Health Trends in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Natural Health Trends and Universal Insurance is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Universal Insurance Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Natural Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Natural Health Trends has no effect on the direction of Universal Insurance i.e., Universal Insurance and Natural Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Universal Insurance and Natural Health

Assuming the 90 days horizon Universal Insurance Holdings is expected to generate 1.07 times more return on investment than Natural Health. However, Universal Insurance is 1.07 times more volatile than Natural Health Trends. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Natural Health Trends is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,826  in Universal Insurance Holdings on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  234.00  from holding Universal Insurance Holdings or generate 12.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Universal Insurance Holdings  vs.  Natural Health Trends

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Universal Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Universal Insurance Holdings are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Universal Insurance reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Natural Health Trends 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Natural Health Trends has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Universal Insurance and Natural Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Universal Insurance and Natural Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Universal Insurance and Natural Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Universal Insurance position performs unexpectedly, Natural Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Natural Health will offset losses from the drop in Natural Health's long position.
The idea behind Universal Insurance Holdings and Natural Health Trends pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins