IFSPF Stock | | | USD 13.07 0.45 3.33% |
SVP
Mr. Ian M. Fillinger is Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President of the Company. He joined Interfor in 2005 as General Manager of the Company Adams Lake Division and has served in a series of increasingly responsible positions since that time. He was appointed Senior VicePresident Head of Operations with responsibility for all of the Company operations and capital project activities in December 2015. since 2018.
Age | 54 |
Tenure | 6 years |
Phone | 604 422 3400 |
Web | https://www.interfor.com |
Interfor Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset
(ROA) of
0.1907 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1907 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity
(ROE) of
0.3266 %, meaning that it generated $0.3266 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Interfor's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Interfor manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
Interfor has accumulated 790.63
M in total debt with debt to equity ratio
(D/E) of 0.19, which may suggest the company is not taking enough advantage from borrowing. Interfor has a current ratio of 2.39, suggesting that it is
liquid and has the ability to pay its financial obligations in time and when they become due. Debt can assist Interfor until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Interfor's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Interfor sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Interfor to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Interfor's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.
Interfor Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, produces and sells wood products in Canada, the United States, Japan, China, Taiwan, and internationally. Interfor Corporation was incorporated in 1963 and is headquartered in Burnaby, Canada. Intl Forest operates under Lumber Wood Production classification in the United States and is traded on OTC Exchange. It employs 3488 people. Interfor [IFSPF] is a
Pink Sheet which is traded through a dealer network over-the-counter (OTC).
Management Performance
Interfor Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Interfor's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Interfor inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Interfor. The board's role is to monitor Interfor's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Interfor's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Interfor's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Richard Pozzebon, Ex CFO | |
| Simon Luxmoore, Exec Operations | |
| Tim Hartnett, VP HR | |
| Mike Mackay, VP Strategy | |
| Eric Larouche, VP Operations | |
| Ian Fillinger, Sr. VP of Canadian Operations | |
| Andrew Horahan, Ex Operations | |
| Barton Bender, Senior Vice President - Sales and Marketing | |
| Xenia Kritsos, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary | |
Interfor Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right pink sheet is not an easy task. Is Interfor a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Currently Active Assets on Macroaxis
Other Information on Investing in Interfor Pink Sheet
Interfor financial ratios help investors to determine whether Interfor Pink Sheet is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Interfor with respect to the benefits of owning Interfor security.