SM Energy Company Leadership
SM Stock | USD 45.19 0.36 0.80% |
SM Energy employs about 544 people. The company is managed by 29 executives with a total tenure of roughly 195 years, averaging almost 6.0 years of service per executive, having 18.76 employees per reported executive. Analysis of SM Energy's management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
Javan Ottoson CEO CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee |
Herbert Vogel CEO President, Chief Executive Officer, Director |
SM Energy |
SM Energy's Workforce Through the Years
Please note that employee historical analysis has become an increasingly important factor for investors assessing the risk associated with SM Energy's future performance. Based on our forecasts, it is anticipated that SM Energy will maintain a workforce of about 540 employees by December 2024.SM Energy Management Team Effectiveness
The company has Return on Asset (ROA) of 0.0973 % which means that for every $100 of assets, it generated a profit of $0.0973. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows a return on total equity (ROE) of 0.2221 %, which means that it produced $0.2221 on every 100 dollars invested by current stockholders. SM Energy's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well SM Energy manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, SM Energy's Return On Tangible Assets are very stable compared to the past year. As of the 30th of November 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.13, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.12. At this time, SM Energy's Fixed Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year. As of the 30th of November 2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.13, while Net Tangible Assets are likely to drop about 2.3 B.As of the 30th of November 2024, Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is likely to grow to about 1.1 B, while Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop about 73.8 M.
SM Energy Workforce Comparison
SM Energy Co is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Energy industry is at this time estimated at about 8,324. SM Energy holds roughly 544 in number of employees claiming about 7% of equities under Energy industry.
The company has Net Profit Margin (PM) of 0.35 %, which suggests that even a small decline in it sales will erase profits and may result in a net loss, or a negative profit margin. This is way below average. Likewise, it shows Net Operating Margin (NOM) of 0.54 %, which signifies that for every $100 of sales, it has a net operating income of $0.54. SM Energy Insider Trading History
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific SM Energy insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on SM Energy's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, SM Energy insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Buy/Sell Ratio | # Purchases Trades | # Sales Trades | Total Shares Purchased | Total Shares Sold | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024-09-01 | 0.62 | 31 | 50 | 291,352 | 209,363 |
2024-06-01 | 4.0 | 16 | 4 | 37,799 | 87,000 |
2024-03-01 | 0.3333 | 1 | 3 | 1,839 | 48,506 |
2023-12-01 | 8.0 | 8 | 1 | 2,231 | 1,000.00 |
2023-09-01 | 0.5814 | 25 | 43 | 341,703 | 371,816 |
2023-06-01 | 13.0 | 13 | 1 | 58,778 | 5,000 |
2023-03-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 19,698 | 0.00 |
2022-09-01 | 0.8382 | 57 | 68 | 932,788 | 597,673 |
2022-06-01 | 1.3333 | 8 | 6 | 29,755 | 92,271 |
2022-03-01 | 0.6 | 3 | 5 | 1,125 | 65,562 |
2021-12-01 | 0.44 | 11 | 25 | 143,286 | 292,920 |
2021-09-01 | 0.8667 | 39 | 45 | 545,681 | 179,386 |
2021-06-01 | 7.5 | 15 | 2 | 74,387 | 13,971 |
2020-09-01 | 0.6212 | 41 | 66 | 702,091 | 416,320 |
2019-09-01 | 0.7321 | 41 | 56 | 364,125 | 162,632 |
2018-12-01 | 2.3333 | 7 | 3 | 12,403 | 11,655 |
2018-09-01 | 0.6667 | 46 | 69 | 228,759 | 141,411 |
2018-06-01 | 21.0 | 21 | 1 | 81,448 | 4,500 |
2017-09-01 | 0.6825 | 43 | 63 | 249,195 | 86,966 |
2016-12-01 | 2.6667 | 8 | 3 | 1,678 | 8,000 |
2016-09-01 | 0.7053 | 67 | 95 | 131,469 | 59,180 |
2015-12-01 | 2.75 | 11 | 4 | 10,933 | 25,359 |
2015-09-01 | 0.7766 | 73 | 94 | 273,237 | 165,039 |
2014-12-01 | 4.6667 | 14 | 3 | 31,363 | 29,316 |
2014-09-01 | 0.7339 | 91 | 124 | 203,098 | 166,294 |
2014-06-01 | 12.5 | 25 | 2 | 35,621 | 2,784 |
2014-03-01 | 3.0 | 3 | 1 | 5,500 | 883.00 |
2013-12-01 | 0.4762 | 10 | 21 | 1,296 | 74,638 |
2013-09-01 | 0.7188 | 92 | 128 | 556,145 | 440,062 |
2012-12-01 | 0.8889 | 8 | 9 | 19,460 | 25,053 |
2012-09-01 | 0.7979 | 75 | 94 | 973,204 | 745,962 |
2012-06-01 | 4.1667 | 25 | 6 | 55,358 | 22,308 |
2012-03-01 | 0.3077 | 4 | 13 | 42,088 | 114,387 |
2011-12-01 | 1.25 | 10 | 8 | 14,184 | 47,368 |
2011-09-01 | 0.9848 | 65 | 66 | 201,158 | 143,244 |
2011-03-01 | 0.7297 | 27 | 37 | 75,761 | 115,794 |
2010-12-01 | 0.8636 | 19 | 22 | 26,940 | 36,562 |
2010-09-01 | 0.9545 | 21 | 22 | 53,269 | 24,962 |
2010-06-01 | 15.0 | 15 | 1 | 52,050 | 15,644 |
2010-03-01 | 0.6364 | 21 | 33 | 11,250 | 11,929 |
2009-12-01 | 0.85 | 17 | 20 | 25,478 | 25,853 |
2009-09-01 | 11.0 | 11 | 1 | 67,075 | 1,000.00 |
2009-06-01 | 14.0 | 14 | 1 | 42,013 | 1,700 |
2009-03-01 | 1.1053 | 42 | 38 | 39,397 | 17,331 |
2008-12-01 | 1.4 | 21 | 15 | 21,878 | 20,825 |
2008-09-01 | 0.0811 | 3 | 37 | 20,125 | 81,102 |
2008-06-01 | 1.0571 | 37 | 35 | 157,876 | 226,016 |
2008-03-01 | 0.6667 | 44 | 66 | 83,281 | 72,215 |
2007-12-01 | 4.5 | 9 | 2 | 2,051 | 29,309 |
2007-09-01 | 1.4167 | 17 | 12 | 68,505 | 34,883 |
2007-06-01 | 1.4286 | 10 | 7 | 77,536 | 99,102 |
2007-03-01 | 0.2647 | 9 | 34 | 11,971 | 194,573 |
2006-12-01 | 1.6667 | 10 | 6 | 10,624 | 10,621 |
2006-09-01 | 0.5 | 2 | 4 | 6,248 | 12,496 |
2006-06-01 | 3.5 | 14 | 4 | 56,975 | 14,600 |
2006-03-01 | 1.375 | 22 | 16 | 151,431 | 73,480 |
2005-12-01 | 0.1386 | 14 | 101 | 101,404 | 368,454 |
2005-09-01 | 0.5385 | 7 | 13 | 32,704 | 143,015 |
2005-06-01 | 1.5 | 12 | 8 | 185,377 | 85,880 |
2005-03-01 | 1.2222 | 11 | 9 | 25,543 | 27,356 |
2004-12-01 | 0.3846 | 10 | 26 | 33,587 | 19,248 |
2004-09-01 | 0.4286 | 3 | 7 | 7,245 | 14,891 |
2004-06-01 | 2.1111 | 19 | 9 | 78,603 | 13,365 |
2004-03-01 | 0.7083 | 17 | 24 | 59,657 | 3,438,086 |
2003-12-01 | 2.0 | 18 | 9 | 97,400 | 60,233 |
2003-09-01 | 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 37,500 | 4,086 |
2003-06-01 | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 40,436 | 5,290 |
2003-03-01 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 500.00 | 15,290 |
SM Energy Notable Stakeholders
A SM Energy stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as SM Energy often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. SM Energy's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting SM Energy's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Javan Ottoson | CEO and President Director and Member of Executive Committee | Profile | |
Herbert Vogel | President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | Profile | |
William Sullivan | Independent Chairman of the Board | Profile | |
Kenneth Knott | Senior Vice President—Business Development and Land and Assistant Secretary | Profile | |
Lehman Newton | Senior Vice President - Regional Manager | Profile | |
Patrick Lytle | Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | Profile | |
David Whitcomb | Vice President - Marketing | Profile | |
Mary Lutey | Senior Vice President — Development and Environmental, Health and Safety | Profile | |
David Copeland | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Corporate Secretary | Profile | |
A Pursell | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President | Profile | |
Wade Pursell | CFO and Executive VP | Profile | |
Julio Quintana | Lead Independent Director | Profile | |
Jennifer Samuels | Sr. Director of Investor Relations | Profile | |
Loren Leiker | Independent Director | Profile | |
Rose Robeson | Independent Director | Profile | |
Stephen Brand | Independent Director | Profile | |
Carla Bailo | Independent Director | Profile | |
Larry Bickle | Independent Director | Profile | |
Ramiro Peru | Independent Director | Profile | |
Dean Lutey | VP Officer | Profile | |
Susie Piehl | Vice Resources | Profile | |
Elizabeth McDonald | Executive Officer | Profile | |
James Lebeck | Executive Counsel | Profile | |
Lehman III | VP Operations | Profile | |
Julie Gray | Vice Marketing | Profile | |
Candace Lyon | VP HR | Profile | |
Anita Powers | Independent Director | Profile | |
Richard Jenkins | Vice Operations | Profile | |
Andrew Fiske | Deputy Secretary | Profile |
About SM Energy Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as SM Energy often depends on how effective the management is. SM Energy management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of SM Energy management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the SM Energy management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.17 | 0.12 | |
Return On Assets | 0.13 | 0.13 | |
Return On Equity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
SM Energy Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as SM Energy use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare SM Energy within its industry.SM Energy Manpower Efficiency
Return on SM Energy Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 4.4M | |
Revenue Per Executive | 81.9M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 1.5M | |
Net Income Per Executive | 28.2M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 519.5K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 9.7M |
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in SM Energy Co. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in population. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.
Is Oil & Gas Exploration & Production space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of SM Energy. If investors know SM Energy will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about SM Energy listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.112 | Dividend Share 0.74 | Earnings Share 7.14 | Revenue Per Share 20.3 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.04) |
The market value of SM Energy is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of SM Energy that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of SM Energy's value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is SM Energy's true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because SM Energy's market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect SM Energy's underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between SM Energy's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if SM Energy is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, SM Energy's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.