Restaurant Brands Company Top Management
QSP-UN Stock | CAD 97.31 0.07 0.07% |
Restaurant Brands employs about 9 K people. The company is managed by 13 executives with a total tenure of roughly 21000 years, averaging almost 1615.0 years of service per executive, having 692.31 employees per reported executive. Analysis of Restaurant Brands' management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Restaurant |
Restaurant Brands Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0586 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0586 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3731 %, meaning that it generated $0.3731 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Restaurant Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Restaurant Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of November 29, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.10. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.07. The current year's Non Currrent Assets Other is expected to grow to about 1.3 B, whereas Total Assets are forecasted to decline to about 20.7 B.The current year's Common Stock Shares Outstanding is expected to grow to about 483.8 M, whereas Net Income Applicable To Common Shares is forecasted to decline to about 1.1 B.
Restaurant Brands Workforce Comparison
Restaurant Brands International is currently regarded as top stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Consumer Discretionary industry is at this time estimated at about 469,998. Restaurant Brands claims roughly 9,000 in number of employees contributing just under 2% to stocks in Consumer Discretionary industry.
Restaurant Brands Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.23 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.27 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.27.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.56 | 0.399 |
|
| |||||
Net Profit Margin | 0.13 | 0.1695 |
|
| |||||
Operating Profit Margin | 0.26 | 0.2921 |
|
| |||||
Return On Assets | 0.029 | 0.0509 |
|
| |||||
Return On Equity | 0.23 | 0.4152 |
|
|
Restaurant Brands Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Restaurant Brands Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Restaurant Brands price series and its benchmark/peer.
Restaurant Brands Notable Stakeholders
A Restaurant Brands stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Restaurant Brands often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Restaurant Brands' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Restaurant Brands' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Axel Schwan | President Inc | Profile | |
David Shear | President Inc | Profile | |
Thomas Curtis | President Inc | Profile | |
Sami Siddiqui | President Inc | Profile | |
Fernando Machado | Chief Inc | Profile | |
Jeff Housman | Chief Inc | Profile | |
Matthew Dunnigan | Chief Inc | Profile | |
Patrick Doyle | Executive Inc | Profile | |
Joshua Kobza | Chief Inc | Profile | |
Jill Granat | General Inc | Profile | |
Duncan Fulton | Chief Inc | Profile | |
Jacqueline Friesner | Chief Inc | Profile | |
Jose Cil | Chief Inc | Profile |
About Restaurant Brands Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Restaurant Brands often depends on how effective the management is. Restaurant Brands management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Restaurant management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Restaurant management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | 0.18 | 0.10 | |
Return On Capital Employed | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
Return On Assets | 0.05 | 0.03 | |
Return On Equity | 0.42 | 0.23 |
Please note, the presentation of Restaurant Brands' financial position, as portrayed in its financial statements, is often influenced by management's estimates, judgments, and sometimes even manipulations. In the best case, Restaurant Brands' management is honest, while the outside auditors are strict and uncompromising. Please utilize our Beneish M Score to check the likelihood of Restaurant Brands' management manipulating its earnings.
Restaurant Brands Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Restaurant Brands use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Restaurant Brands within its industry.Restaurant Brands Manpower Efficiency
Return on Restaurant Brands Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 780.2K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 540.2M | |
Net Income Per Employee | 190.9K | |
Net Income Per Executive | 132.2M | |
Working Capital Per Employee | 3.2K | |
Working Capital Per Executive | 2.2M |
Complementary Tools for Restaurant Stock analysis
When running Restaurant Brands' price analysis, check to measure Restaurant Brands' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Restaurant Brands is operating at the current time. Most of Restaurant Brands' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Restaurant Brands' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Restaurant Brands' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Restaurant Brands to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas |