FT Cboe Correlations
XJUL Etf | 35.23 0.15 0.43% |
A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as FT Cboe moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if FT Cboe Vest moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction.
XJUL |
Moving together with XJUL Etf
0.96 | BUFR | First Trust Cboe | PairCorr |
0.96 | BUFD | FT Cboe Vest | PairCorr |
0.97 | PSEP | Innovator SP 500 | PairCorr |
0.98 | PJAN | Innovator SP 500 | PairCorr |
0.97 | PJUL | Innovator SP 500 | PairCorr |
0.97 | PAUG | Innovator Equity Power | PairCorr |
0.95 | DNOV | FT Cboe Vest | PairCorr |
0.98 | PMAY | Innovator SP 500 | PairCorr |
0.99 | PJUN | Innovator SP 500 | PairCorr |
0.81 | BAC | Bank of America Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
0.77 | AXP | American Express | PairCorr |
0.7 | DIS | Walt Disney | PairCorr |
0.78 | BA | Boeing Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
Moving against XJUL Etf
Related Correlations Analysis
Click cells to compare fundamentals | Check Volatility | Backtest Portfolio |
Correlation Matchups
Over a given time period, the two securities move together when the Correlation Coefficient is positive. Conversely, the two assets move in opposite directions when the Correlation Coefficient is negative. Determining your positions' relationship to each other is valuable for analyzing and projecting your portfolio's future expected return and risk.High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
FT Cboe Competition Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between XJUL Etf performing well and FT Cboe ETF doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze FT Cboe's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.03 | (0.11) | 2.26 | 2.57 | 8.90 | |||
MSFT | 1.11 | (0.20) | 0.00 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 10.31 | |||
UBER | 1.95 | 0.32 | 0.17 | (2.94) | 2.12 | 4.72 | 12.75 | |||
F | 1.43 | 0.08 | 0.08 | (0.31) | 2.15 | 2.71 | 10.14 | |||
T | 1.01 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 1.08 | 1.48 | 1.90 | 11.66 | |||
A | 1.15 | (0.15) | 0.00 | (2.35) | 0.00 | 2.92 | 9.03 | |||
CRM | 1.40 | (0.27) | 0.00 | (0.32) | 0.00 | 2.72 | 8.88 | |||
JPM | 1.11 | 0.06 | 0.00 | (0.02) | 0.00 | 1.99 | 6.85 | |||
MRK | 1.15 | (0.06) | 0.00 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 11.58 | |||
XOM | 1.06 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 1.38 | 2.55 | 5.89 |